Skip to main content

​
Problem Analysis

Before proposing solutions, this section documents what Adrena’s Season 1 revealed and what the strategic opportunity is.

​
What Season 1 Revealed

Adrena’s first trading competition (Jan 31 – Apr 11, 2025) ran during a brutal market. SOL dropped 50%, BTC dropped 20%. Despite this, competitions were the single biggest driver of user acquisition and volume. But Season 1 exposed five structural issues: Issue 1: Engagement Cliff. A 10-week season is too long. Mutagen accumulation is linear, so week 7 feels identical to week 2. Volume is front-loaded and decays after the first few weeks. Issue 2: Sybil Economics Are Cheap. The Z_D_K / D_K_Z cluster on the Season 1 leaderboard demonstrated that spinning up multiple wallets to farm quest rewards costs almost nothing. The Mutagen system rewards activity breadth (quests, streaks) alongside volume, which sybils can grind cheaply. Issue 3: Whale Asymmetry. Volume-tiered brackets help, but absolute P&L still dominates final rankings. A 500tradermakingdisciplined,skilledtradeshasnopathtomeaningfulprizesagainsttradersputting500 trader making disciplined, skilled trades has no path to meaningful prizes against traders putting 25K–$100K on the line. Issue 4: No New User Funnel. The competition assumes you already know how to trade perps. There’s no structured on-ramp for someone who just connected their wallet for the first time. Competitions should be Adrena’s top-of-funnel, not a feature for existing power users only. Issue 5: Single-Format Risk. When 50% of all volume comes from competition activity and that depends on one seasonal leaderboard format, Adrena has a concentration risk. One bad season could crater volume.

​
The Strategic Opportunity: RWA Markets

Adrena’s partnership with Autonom to bring Forex, Gold, Oil, and equity indices on-chain is the protocol’s biggest strategic differentiator. Jupiter, Drift, and Hyperliquid don’t have this. Competition formats that specifically drive adoption of RWA markets create a moat competitors cannot replicate without equivalent oracle infrastructure.

​
Design Principles

Every decision in this design follows four principles:
  1. Entry fee > free farming. If it costs money to enter, sybils need to fund each wallet. This is the single most effective anti-sybil mechanism.
  2. Skill over capital. Scoring must allow a 200tradertooutperforma200 trader to outperform a 20,000 trader through better risk-adjusted returns.
  3. Always-on > seasonal. Multiple overlapping competitions with different durations prevent engagement cliffs.
  4. Drive RWA adoption. Every format should have a natural hook that pulls traders into Adrena’s new traditional markets.

​
Two Interlocking Formats

The competition engine has two complementary formats:
Prop ChallengesWorld Cup
CadenceAlways-on (rolling 7–14 day cohorts)Seasonal (4× per year, 3 weeks each)
Primary GoalOnboarding + continuous engagementEvent-driven hype + RWA adoption
Revenue ModelEntry fees (self-funding)Protocol-funded prize pool
Engagement TypePersonal achievement (“Can I pass?”)Competitive spectacle (“Who’s the best?”)
New User FriendlyYes — structured, low-risk missionsModerate — exciting to watch, accessible to enter
Anti-SybilEntry fee makes farming negative EVFree qualifying + paid knockout buy-in
These formats don’t compete with each other or with existing Mutagen seasons. Prop Challenge performance determines World Cup seeding. Mutagen is earned in both. Quests, streaks, and raffles overlay both.

​
Proposed Format

Prop Challenge Hub is a rolling cohort competition module for Adrena. Traders pay a small entry fee, join a preset-driven cohort, and compete on a visible tournament score instead of a raw PnL board alone. V1 uses one reusable rules engine with multiple preset narratives:
  • Macro Sprint for FX and macro-oriented RWA pairs
  • Carry Breaker for commodities and rate-sensitive rotation
  • Crypto Impulse for high-beta crypto perps
This keeps the system extensible while preserving one operationally simple competition backend.

​
Challenge Flow

[Pay Entry Fee] → [Challenge Active] → [Trade Normally on Adrena]
       ↓                                        ↓
  Fee → Vault PDA                    Indexer tracks P&L, drawdown
                                             ↓
                             ┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
                             ↓               ↓               ↓
                       [Hit Target]   [Breach Drawdown]  [Time Expires]
                             ↓               ↓               ↓
                         ✅ PASS         ❌ FAIL          ❌ FAIL
                             ↓               ↓               ↓
                    Rewards + Badge    Retry available    Retry available
                    + "Funded" status  (30% discount)    (30% discount)
  • Drawdown is measured from the high-water mark during the challenge, not from starting balance — prevents “get lucky once then coast.”
  • Daily Loss Limit is a circuit breaker: losing 3% of starting balance in a single UTC calendar day suspends the challenge until midnight. Prevents tilt trading.
  • All Adrena trades count, including existing open positions. No separate account needed.

​
Retry Economics

Failed challenges can be retried at a 30% discount within 48 hours. The discount window captures the impulse of a failed trader who almost passed. Back-of-envelope: 1,000 Scout attempts per month at 2witha352 with a 35% pass rate → 650 failures × 55% retry rate × 1.40 retry fee = **~500/monthinretryrevenue∗∗fromScoutalone,ontopof500/month in retry revenue** from Scout alone, on top of 2,000 in initial fees. At scale, this makes the Challenge Vault self-sustaining.
Alpha test validated 55% retry rate (target was 25%) — retry revenue projections are conservative by at least 2×.

​
Challenge Tier Parameters

TierEntry FeeMin CapitalProfit TargetMax DDDaily LimitDurationFunded EligibleRetry Discount
Scout$2$508%5%3%7 daysNo30%
Ranger$5$20010%8%4%10 daysNo30%
Veteran$10$50012%6%3%10 daysNo30%
Elite$25$2,00015%5%2.5%14 daysYes30%
Apex$50$5,00015%4%2%14 daysYes30%
When to adjust:
  • Pass rate > 40%: tighten profit target by 2pp or reduce max drawdown by 1pp
  • Pass rate < 15%: relax drawdown limit by 1pp or extend duration by 2 days
  • Retry rate < 20%: increase discount to 40%

​
Specialist Challenges

Specialist challenges restrict traders to a single asset class, driving adoption of Adrena’s RWA markets while rewarding domain expertise.
SpecialistMarketsBonus Multiplier
ForexEURUSD, GBPUSD, USDJPY, AUDUSD1.15x
CommoditiesXAU, XAG, WTI, BRENT1.20x
CryptoBTC, ETH, SOL, BONK1.10x
Multi-AssetBTC, ETH, XAU, EURUSD, WTI1.25x
Trading on disallowed markets during a specialist challenge immediately disqualifies the attempt. The 5-25% bonus multiplier applies to the final score, rewarding traders who demonstrate deep competence in a focused domain. Specialist challenges serve as an RWA adoption driver: when Adrena launches new commodity or forex perpetuals, a corresponding specialist challenge creates immediate demand and liquidity.

​
World Cup Format

The World Cup is a seasonal knockout tournament that runs alongside the rolling prop challenges. It provides the highest-stakes competitive format.

​
Structure

1

4 Divisions

Crypto Cup, Metals Cup, Energy Cup, Forex Cup
2

Qualifying Phase (2 weeks)

Top N traders per division by composite score qualify for the knockout bracket
3

Knockout Phase

Single-elimination bracket, head-to-head RAROI comparison
4

Grand Finals

Division champions compete in a 48-hour all-markets battle

​
Redemption Bracket

Semi-final losers are paired in a separate redemption bracket. The redemption winner earns the “Comeback” badge and re-enters the season point pool. This keeps eliminated traders engaged instead of churning.

​
Desk Wars

Traders are assigned to desks (teams of 3-5). Desk aggregate scores contribute a supporter bonus. Top desk earns the “Desk Champion” badge and an extra prize pool share.

​
RAROI Formula

Risk-Adjusted Return on Investment (RAROI) is the head-to-head scoring metric for World Cup matches. Unlike the additive cohort scoring (which also weights volume to incentivize activity), RAROI is a multiplicative formula that rewards skill-intensive trading: 
RAROI = ROI% x WinRateFactor x ActivityFactor - DrawdownPenalty
Where:
  • ROI% = realized P&L as percentage of starting equity
  • WinRateFactor = min(2.0, 0.5 + (winRate/100) x 1.5)
  • ActivityFactor = min(1.5, 0.5 + activeDays/totalDays)
  • DrawdownPenalty = maxDrawdown% x 0.3

​
Worked Example

TraderROI%Win RateActive DaysTotal DaysMax DDRAROI
Dave40%70%14145%91.50
Alice20%60%13143%39.10
Carol25%50%7145%29.75
Bob2%55%10142%2.62
  • Dave dominates with high ROI, strong win rate, and perfect activity — even with the same 5% drawdown as Carol, his multiplicative advantage is decisive.
  • Alice beats Carol despite lower ROI because her 13/14 active days (AF=1.43) and 60% win rate (WRF=1.4) multiply more effectively than Carol’s 7/14 activity.
  • Bob demonstrates that RAROI punishes low ROI harshly — even with the best drawdown (2%), a 2% ROI produces a negligible score.

​
Rules and Scoring

  • Users join a time-bounded cohort with a fixed participant cap.
  • Tournament score is computed from:
    • realized PnL percentage
    • trading volume
    • consistency score
    • win rate
    • max drawdown penalty
  • Ties break by higher PnL, then higher volume, then earliest attainment time.
  • Suspicious accounts remain visible on the board but cannot claim rewards until ops review is complete.

​
Reward Structure

  • Entry fees contribute to each cohort prize pool.
  • Fee allocation: 60% rewards pool, 25% ADX buyback, 15% raffle prizes.
  • Top five eligible traders receive deterministic payout splits.
  • Top finishers also earn Funded Trader season status with modeled revenue-share eligibility.
  • Quest points, streak boosts, and raffle tickets are layered on top so users still care even when they are outside the cash line.
  • A projection lab shows how changing trader behavior alters rank, payout, and funded progression.

​
Competitive Analysis

Jupiter runs simple PnL leaderboards with no entry fee. Adrena’s prop challenge format adds: paid entry (anti-sybil), funded trader progression (retention), specialist challenges (RWA adoption), and engagement loops (quests/streaks/raffles).
Drift competitions focus on volume incentives. Adrena’s scoring is multi-dimensional (PnL + volume + consistency + win rate - drawdown), preventing pure volume farming from dominating the leaderboard.
Hyperliquid runs invite-only competitions for elite traders. Adrena’s tiered system (Scout to Apex) creates an accessible on-ramp: anyone can start at $2 Scout and work up to Apex. The World Cup format then provides the elite competitive layer.
No competitor offers specialist challenges across forex, commodities, and crypto perpetuals. Adrena’s Autonom-powered RWA markets are a unique differentiator — the specialist challenge format directly converts this technical moat into user engagement and liquidity.

​
Why This Is More Engaging

  • It replaces passive leaderboard watching with an explicit enrollment decision.
  • Paid entry introduces commitment and raises the cost of sybil farming.
  • Funded-season status creates an aspirational progression layer beyond one-off prizes.
  • Preset narratives let Adrena spotlight new Autonom-powered RWA markets without building one-off event code for each launch.
  • Quests, streaks, and raffles turn cohorts into an engagement hub rather than a single leaderboard page.

​
Edge Cases and Abuse Prevention

  • Manual-review, sybil, wash-trading, and self-trading flags all block rewards.
  • Flagged users remain publicly visible to preserve leaderboard transparency.
  • Capacity and fixed windows prevent late unlimited farming.
  • Deterministic tie-breakers avoid operator discretion at payout boundaries.
  • Sybil detection heuristics: same funding source within 1h = cluster, 3+ wallets from same source = flagged for manual review, identical entry timestamps elevate confidence to “high”.